The SEC by and large has administrative specialist over the issuance or resale of any token or other advanced resource that constitutes a security. Beneath U.S. law, a security incorporates “an speculation contract,” which has been characterized by the U.S. Incomparable Court as an venture of cash in a common venture with a sensible desire of benefits to be inferred from the entrepreneurial or administrative endeavors of others. SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293, 301 (1946).
In deciding whether a token or other computerized resource is an “investment contract,” both the SEC and the courts see at the substance of the exchange, rather than its frame. In 1943, the U.S. Incomparable Court decided that “the reach of the [Securities] Act does not halt with the self-evident and commonplace. Novel, unprecedented, or sporadic gadgets, anything they show up to be, are too come to in the event that it be demonstrated as matter of truth that they were broadly advertised or managed in beneath terms or courses of managing which built up their character in commerce as ‘investment contracts,’ or as ‘any intrigued or instrument commonly known as a ‘security’.” SEC v. C.M. Joiner Renting Corp., 320 U.S. 344, 351 (1943). It has moreover been said that “Congress’ reason in sanctioning the securities laws was to direct ventures, in anything shape they are made and by anything title they are called.” Reves v. Ernst & Youthful, 494 U.S. 56, 61 (1990).
The SEC has been clear on its position that indeed in case a token issued in an beginning coin advertising (“ICO”) has “utility,” the token will still be regarded to be a security that's directed beneath the Securities Act in case it meets components of the Howey test. On February 6, 2018, in composed declaration to the U.S. Senate Managing an account Committee, the Chairman of the SEC expressed as takes after:
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire